People's micro comments: When the fireworks fade away, apologies alone are not enough.

Recently, a "fireworks show" sponsored by a certain outdoor brand sparked controversy when it was set off in the Ralong area of the Himalayas in Tibet. After the fireworks dissipated, it ignited public doubts: will this unexpected operation damage the ecosystem of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau? Will it disturb the growth of local animals and plants? If harm is caused, how will it be repaired? Where is the boundary of artistic expression? How should brand marketing activities under the name of art be regulated? Currently, the brand and the artist involved have publicly apologized. Local authorities have also stated that an investigation team has been dispatched to the scene. We look forward to the follow-up investigation addressing the public's questions: how was it approved initially, and was there a scientific assessment? The investigation should comprehensively assess the ecological impact and provide a convincing explanation. Environmental protection and art are not in opposition but can complement each other, with the key being appropriate standards and regulations. True art should respect truth, goodness, and beauty, revere nature, soothe the soul, rather than harm the natural world. Commercial involvement should also have rules and boundaries, advocating positive and benevolent values, instead of seeking attention through sensationalism. After the fireworks dissipate, what remains should not be just apologies but actions to protect the ecosystem.