Special rectification action for network chaos in the automotive industry publicizes the third batch of typical cases.

Recently, the Cyberspace Administration of China, together with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and other departments, focused on prominent issues such as inciting group opposition, hyping negative topics, and conducting improper evaluations. They continued to carry out special rectification of chaotic practices in the automotive industry online, and legally handled a number of accounts that violated laws and regulations. The following are some typical cases reported: 1. Accounts such as "" continuously posted derogatory information, inciting consumer group opposition. Weibo accounts "" and "", Today's headline account "", and Bilibili account "" used labeling and stigmatization to attack specific car brand users, inciting consumer group opposition. The involved accounts have been legally dealt with. 2. Accounts such as "Blood" maliciously hyped negative topics about car companies, defaming and attacking car companies and entrepreneurs. Weibo accounts "Blood" and "", TikTok account "", WeChat public account "", etc., have long been publishing defamatory statements against certain car products and business models, maliciously tarnishing and attacking car companies and entrepreneurs. The involved accounts have been legally dealt with. 3. Accounts such as "" distorted the interpretation of car company financial statements, disrupting normal business operations. TikTok account "", Weibo accounts "" and "", etc., maliciously distorted the interpretation of company financial statements, exaggerated financial data fluctuations caused by increased R&D investment into a "financial crisis", and used terms like "XX is about to collapse" and "XX cars are going to fail" to denigrate the development prospects of some new energy car companies. The involved accounts have been legally dealt with. 4. Platforms like "" carried out improper evaluations, disrupting the market order of the automotive industry. Automotive vertical platforms such as "" and "" conducted improper evaluation projects like "" and "", and published biased automotive evaluation information through related accounts, misleading the public's perception of car product quality and performance. The involved accounts have been legally dealt with.