Ministry of Commerce: US has no right to unilaterally determine whether its trading partners have "overcapacity" through Section 301 investigation.
The spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce responded to questions from reporters regarding the announcement by the U.S. Trade Representative's Office to launch a 301 investigation on 16 economies, including China, citing "excess production capacity."
On March 13th, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Commerce answered questions from reporters on the announcement by the Office of the United States Trade Representative to launch a 301 investigation into 16 economies, including China, on the grounds of "overcapacity." The spokesperson stated that China has noticed that the US has initiated a 301 investigation into 16 economies, including China, on the grounds of "overcapacity." The 301 investigation is a typical unilateral act that seriously disrupts the international economic and trade order. WTO experts have already ruled that the tariff measures taken under the 301 investigation violate WTO rules.
The spokesperson pointed out that China has repeatedly clarified its position on the so-called "overcapacity theory" put forward by the US. The world economy has long become an inseparable whole, with production and consumption being global in nature, requiring matching and adjustment of supply and demand from a global perspective. If each country's production only met domestic market demands, there would be no cross-border trade. The US cannot narrowly define production capacity exceeding domestic demand as "overcapacity" and label it as "excessive." The US has no right to unilaterally determine whether a trading partner has "overcapacity" through a 301 investigation and impose unilateral restrictive measures.
The full text is as follows: [original text provided]
Related Articles

"Experts" and "the market" have a huge difference in opinion! The European Central Bank is at a crossroads of interest rates: should they hold steady in 2026 or raise rates quickly before June?

The signal at the 160 warning line has failed? The Japanese government's threshold for intervention in the currency market is being reshaped by the flames of war.

When Trump was pushing for oil drilling, this investment manager instead bought clean energy stocks. Now, he has proven his doubters wrong.
"Experts" and "the market" have a huge difference in opinion! The European Central Bank is at a crossroads of interest rates: should they hold steady in 2026 or raise rates quickly before June?

The signal at the 160 warning line has failed? The Japanese government's threshold for intervention in the currency market is being reshaped by the flames of war.

When Trump was pushing for oil drilling, this investment manager instead bought clean energy stocks. Now, he has proven his doubters wrong.

RECOMMEND

“A+H” Team Continues To Expand Hard Technology Firms Accelerate Global Deployment
11/03/2026

Anti‑Stagflation Theme Guides Hong Kong Allocation Institutions Identify Power And Energy Assets As Short‑Term Core
11/03/2026

U.S. Equities Enter “Always‑On” Trading Era Nasdaq Advances Stock Tokenization Framework
11/03/2026


